Ir al contenido principal

Power! Unlimited power!

Throughout history,  humans have seen how life has changed,  how their expectations of technology have evolved and how wrong we were about it since the beginning. In this case, I am referring to the fact that we have a big imagination about what we are capable of, but sometimes, this idea might go too far or ever to close,  there is no middle. 

In the specific case of technology,  we have something certain,  some authors like Asimov were right about the limits we should include  in this area, called "The three laws of Robotics":

  1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. 
 where we define a limit in the way we use technology. 

In the case of computer science, we have seen in such a small time how it has grown and has changed our way of living. I think that people who started with this technology never thought that in nearly 50 years people, not the scientist,  would have access to what they had and anywhere they go.  In the case of programming languages, I think that there are limits between hardware and software that developers have seen and that have to limit them in the way they use them. Also, there is a more common programming language that the majority pays more attention to, so the changes and benefits gotten by a programming language are stopped by the evolution of another one. 

Talking about functional languages, there must be recognized as a great understanding of the hardware been used, the way a computer thinks and the mathematical operations that need to be followed to get into the desired result. This is due to the fact that computer transforms everything we make as input and transform it into binary operations. In these of  Clojure, this tries to express an algorithm into a concept that can be easily understood by the computer and the programmer. Personally speaking,  the way this programming language understand the Loops is easier explained rather than the way people express it in other languages.  In the case of Mathematica, it is an easier language and that can be easily taught to kids that might get them attracted to mathematics and even programming,  becoming a great benefit to this area. 

Another  benefit, and   the way  we could  get more people to program in functional languages is that  Concurrency and Parallelism, topics that  are  in,   can be easily explored  by this  kind of languages and  even  applied, making a  great difference among other programming languages that make this topic more complex, generating the idea that   we can do anything  just  by knowing this kind of language. 
 

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

The ultimate weapon.

As programmers, we have a limited language and an objective to create great things.  I consider that wee needs to understand that in comparison to other careers we have something established and that needs to be understandable to everyone else without rodeos.  Up to this moment at the University we have been taught many programming languages, the way to use them, the internationality that they have and the many ways we can use to solve a problem. We are the society of limited language but great imagination. There are some good practices that as developers we need to follow, such as making the code as understandable as possible, to generate the documentation, to describe what we are doing and so on, so that people who read our code can easily understand it and make the proper changes in the correct time. But sometimes, people do not understand it and generate the code as hard as they can, so that their ideas cannot be stolen.  The problem with developers who do this is that the li

This is a man's world,but it wouldn't be nothing, nothing without a woman

All my life I've been compared to my brother and since I remember this has been a problem in my anxiety. Anyway, this way of living made that I developed an interest in the STEM areas.  In this case, I felt that's many fragments in the reading became part of my everyday thoughts. In this case, what we can remember about history is that it is been told by the winners or the people in power,  and normally in a patriarchal way of living sometimes women get erased in this story. That was the case of many women in many different areas, companies, and countries. Anyway, they have been moments in history that women had to take some jobs even though they were not prepared for them (or society).  That' was the case of many well-known programmers and generations of women who had to work in these areas. I consider that  this  is also seen in a country that had participated actively in  the development  of new technology and  in some specific moment in history.   I think that

But Mom, I just want to be Popular

This podcast was about the way Clojure was developing. I consider that the way Rich Hickey explains it is quite simple and tries to convince the audience that this programming language and way of programming is quite good, useful and simple. In this case, he explains since the use of Lisp, and how it was really popular in the 1970s,  but as computers become more complex, could do more with less and requiring more complex programs the multiparadigm languages lost the battle. Anyway, he tries to expose the way he and the java developers try to make a great comeback with this programming language. This is due to the fact that it got advantages and some other applications among some programming languages. In this case, I can compare this programming language with Mathematica, a programming language (that people consider software to compute math problems)  that can do as much as Clojure can, but with the limitations that you should understand the way the math works and the way the comp