Ir al contenido principal

But Mom, I just want to be Popular

This podcast was about the way Clojure was developing. I consider that the way Rich Hickey explains it is quite simple and tries to convince the audience that this programming language and way of programming is quite good, useful and simple. In this case, he explains since the use of Lisp, and how it was really popular in the 1970s,  but as computers become more complex, could do more with less and requiring more complex programs the multiparadigm languages lost the battle.

Anyway, he tries to expose the way he and the java developers try to make a great comeback with this programming language. This is due to the fact that it got advantages and some other applications among some programming languages. In this case, I can compare this programming language with Mathematica, a programming language (that people consider software to compute math problems)  that can do as much as Clojure can, but with the limitations that you should understand the way the math works and the way the computer works. A disadvantage of this language is the way you get it (due to the fact that you need to pay for it) and the limits it gives the developer to change the way the functions work.

In comparison with Mathematica, Clojure gives the developer or common person, a  way to understand how math and the computer works within a non-abstract way of thinking: LISTS. This characteristic might be hard to understand at first and without knowledge, but as you get closer with it you can understand, change and modify anything you want. Personally, I consider that the unpopularity of this programming language in comparison with others is the marketing strategy they give it and the uses they give, in comparison with Mathematica, which also has a webpage, an app and some cool things to help kids with their math problems. Also, the way the syntaxis of Clojure gives a disadvantage, due to the way people learn math.

In the case of  Clojure with computer science,  this really got a great advantage because the way it thinks is compared with some of the basic data structures that computers follow and programmers should know and manage. Also, this language has got the possibility of changing what is already defined according to the developer (just as Linux) and you can change some of the instructions into the way you want and need,  giving the developer freedom to do some things beneath the limits.  Finally, and as we have seen in class,  the  way this programming language thinks, works and communicate with the hardware makes it easier to  understand  the way a computer thinks  and  doe the math needed for a simple command

Comentarios

Publicar un comentario

Entradas populares de este blog

Prepare for trouble! And make it double! To protect the world from devastation!

When we think about a programmer we think about someone who is alone in a room, who don't know how to talk to others and even someone who doesn't talk to their family. But people who think about programmers just like that do not know my friends, who are the most awesome programmers in the world and that can help you and teach you when you can not continue. I think that is the purpose of pair programming, to help each other and to think outside the box and to finally understand and teach that people need to work together and that people who surround them matters.  In this case, I consider that some of the people in my generation know how to solve this way of thinking and working but not everyone and this should become an important way of developing. This idea is due to the fact that we think that people who we normally choose for our teams is not on the level as the way the other classmates who surround us. This way of programming also gives the programmer a new way of thi...
Publicar un comentario
Leer más

Power! Unlimited power!

Throughout history,  humans have seen how life has changed,  how their expectations of technology have evolved and how wrong we were about it since the beginning. In this case, I am referring to the fact that we have a big imagination about what we are capable of, but sometimes, this idea might go too far or ever to close,  there is no middle.  In the specific case of technology,  we have something certain,  some authors like Asimov were right about the limits we should include  in this area, called "The three laws of Robotics": A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.   where we define a limit in the way we use technology.  In the case of comp...
Publicar un comentario
Leer más

chay' let spanish jatlh

I have always been into languages, and that's maybe I'm studying this career. As I've been learning to program, I've noticed that there are many elements similar between each other, but also, specific differences that make an advantage. The text reminded me of a song called "Qué dificil es hablar el español", where two guys show the differences and similarities between some Spanish speakers countries.  I think that this is almost the same problem that programming languages live, where people who use them try to set them as the most popular or important against others. Personally speaking I think that all languages have their beauty and their characteristics, such as  Spanish, where some words make a phrase sound spectacular. Also, it is important to mention that each language might be easier to teach rather than others, so the programming community might grow up because of this. I know that programming languages have really grown up, but some of them are...
Publicar un comentario
Leer más