Ir al contenido principal

But Mom, I just want to be Popular

This podcast was about the way Clojure was developing. I consider that the way Rich Hickey explains it is quite simple and tries to convince the audience that this programming language and way of programming is quite good, useful and simple. In this case, he explains since the use of Lisp, and how it was really popular in the 1970s,  but as computers become more complex, could do more with less and requiring more complex programs the multiparadigm languages lost the battle.

Anyway, he tries to expose the way he and the java developers try to make a great comeback with this programming language. This is due to the fact that it got advantages and some other applications among some programming languages. In this case, I can compare this programming language with Mathematica, a programming language (that people consider software to compute math problems)  that can do as much as Clojure can, but with the limitations that you should understand the way the math works and the way the computer works. A disadvantage of this language is the way you get it (due to the fact that you need to pay for it) and the limits it gives the developer to change the way the functions work.

In comparison with Mathematica, Clojure gives the developer or common person, a  way to understand how math and the computer works within a non-abstract way of thinking: LISTS. This characteristic might be hard to understand at first and without knowledge, but as you get closer with it you can understand, change and modify anything you want. Personally, I consider that the unpopularity of this programming language in comparison with others is the marketing strategy they give it and the uses they give, in comparison with Mathematica, which also has a webpage, an app and some cool things to help kids with their math problems. Also, the way the syntaxis of Clojure gives a disadvantage, due to the way people learn math.

In the case of  Clojure with computer science,  this really got a great advantage because the way it thinks is compared with some of the basic data structures that computers follow and programmers should know and manage. Also, this language has got the possibility of changing what is already defined according to the developer (just as Linux) and you can change some of the instructions into the way you want and need,  giving the developer freedom to do some things beneath the limits.  Finally, and as we have seen in class,  the  way this programming language thinks, works and communicate with the hardware makes it easier to  understand  the way a computer thinks  and  doe the math needed for a simple command

Comentarios

Publicar un comentario

Entradas populares de este blog

The ultimate weapon.

As programmers, we have a limited language and an objective to create great things.  I consider that wee needs to understand that in comparison to other careers we have something established and that needs to be understandable to everyone else without rodeos.  Up to this moment at the University we have been taught many programming languages, the way to use them, the internationality that they have and the many ways we can use to solve a problem. We are the society of limited language but great imagination. There are some good practices that as developers we need to follow, such as making the code as understandable as possible, to generate the documentation, to describe what we are doing and so on, so that people who read our code can easily understand it and make the proper changes in the correct time. But sometimes, people do not understand it and generate the code as hard as they can, so that their ideas cannot be stolen.  The problem with developers who do this is that the li
Publicar un comentario
Leer más

This is a man's world,but it wouldn't be nothing, nothing without a woman

All my life I've been compared to my brother and since I remember this has been a problem in my anxiety. Anyway, this way of living made that I developed an interest in the STEM areas.  In this case, I felt that's many fragments in the reading became part of my everyday thoughts. In this case, what we can remember about history is that it is been told by the winners or the people in power,  and normally in a patriarchal way of living sometimes women get erased in this story. That was the case of many women in many different areas, companies, and countries. Anyway, they have been moments in history that women had to take some jobs even though they were not prepared for them (or society).  That' was the case of many well-known programmers and generations of women who had to work in these areas. I consider that  this  is also seen in a country that had participated actively in  the development  of new technology and  in some specific moment in history.   I think that
Publicar un comentario
Leer más