Ir al contenido principal

The ultimate weapon.

As programmers, we have a limited language and an objective to create great things.  I consider that wee needs to understand that in comparison to other careers we have something established and that needs to be understandable to everyone else without rodeos. 

Up to this moment at the University we have been taught many programming languages, the way to use them, the internationality that they have and the many ways we can use to solve a problem. We are the society of limited language but great imagination.

There are some good practices that as developers we need to follow, such as making the code as understandable as possible, to generate the documentation, to describe what we are doing and so on, so that people who read our code can easily understand it and make the proper changes in the correct time. But sometimes, people do not understand it and generate the code as hard as they can, so that their ideas cannot be stolen. 

The problem with developers who do this is that the limited languages that we have become the hardest book we have ever read and they become someone essential in the company and so they have control of the things we need.  What I am referring to is similar to the control that the government has in the book of George Orwell to the language and so to the way people think. In our case,  the company where the developer who follows these rules thinks that they cannot fire him because he has got all the knowledge, but as programmers, we need to make stuff that people continue to use even though we are not there anymore or that can change according to the necessities. 

The other problem that I consider we have as developers another important thing to take into consideration: the use of our programs. We got the power to get to people in an easy way, to get their information and to easily make them change their ideas. The problem with that is that people might use their information in the wrong way.  Information is the most valuable thing nowadays and people would kill for all the things that we can have access while creating an app because people do not read the terms of privacy. 

I consider that we have both sides, lots of power and limited language and that's maybe the reason people do not like to program. We need to change the way we think to some simple commands that can or cannot be understandable to any human being. We need to take into consideration that people change and that they become more and more lazhy and that what we create might make a change in their lives or not. 

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Power! Unlimited power!

Throughout history,  humans have seen how life has changed,  how their expectations of technology have evolved and how wrong we were about it since the beginning. In this case, I am referring to the fact that we have a big imagination about what we are capable of, but sometimes, this idea might go too far or ever to close,  there is no middle.  In the specific case of technology,  we have something certain,  some authors like Asimov were right about the limits we should include  in this area, called "The three laws of Robotics": A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.   where we define a limit in the way we use technology.  In the case of comp...

The roots of al evil

This article is about the idea of  Lisp, its origins and why it was created. We need to take into consideration that technology has changed a lot since the 1950s and every year  Moore's Law becomes more real. We come from an era where big rooms were used for a single computer up to the time where a cellphone has the same power as a computer. In this case that was the problem that McCarthy found out while developing  Lisp.   According to the reading, there are many things he needed to take into consideration while developing this language and also because he had to fight a  major programming language: C. This programming language became popular among programmers and people who use a computer but it is still difficult to use for some other things. In this case, what I am referring to is that using C as multiparadigm language and some of the characteristics that make Lisp easier to use and many people who do not program can use. In the case ...

chay' let spanish jatlh

I have always been into languages, and that's maybe I'm studying this career. As I've been learning to program, I've noticed that there are many elements similar between each other, but also, specific differences that make an advantage. The text reminded me of a song called "Qué dificil es hablar el español", where two guys show the differences and similarities between some Spanish speakers countries.  I think that this is almost the same problem that programming languages live, where people who use them try to set them as the most popular or important against others. Personally speaking I think that all languages have their beauty and their characteristics, such as  Spanish, where some words make a phrase sound spectacular. Also, it is important to mention that each language might be easier to teach rather than others, so the programming community might grow up because of this. I know that programming languages have really grown up, but some of them are...